Saturday, 15 September 2012

Update 15 September

Getting back into the photography now after a break due to work commitment and the Olympics.

It will not be full on for a few weeks as the training for New York marathon takes precedence but finishing Chapter 2 and getting a good review for the assignment certainly provides a boost.

Have not been entirely idle anyway on the photogprahy front. Completed the post processing for Scotalnd photos on

https://picasaweb.google.com/100550359710941675762/ScotlandJuly2012?authkey=Gv1sRgCMvAtOu-5azPtgE. Very pleased with some of these; there are some really cracking photos, especially the black and whites and some of the composites. Took a lot of time to use Photomatix, Sivler Efex Pro, and Topaz for many of the pictures. Cannot do this for all (although ideally one would) because of time. It has been a reminder of the power of these tools, especially the sharpening power of Topaz, as note din my notes on the Assignment.

Have taken the image for first exercise of Chapter 3.
 


Sunday, 9 September 2012

The Photograph as Contemporary Art: chapters1-2



Charlotte Cotton's book is intended as a survey of the field of Photography as Contemporary Art. She dividends the book into eight sections:

1.           Photographers who have devised strategies especially for the camera. Looks at the degree to which the focus has been preconceived by the photographer;
2.           Story telling in art photography;
3.           Deadpan;
4.           Something and Nothing - how the mundane has featured in art photography;
5.           Emotional and personal relationships;
6.           Documentary;
7.           Extending our pre existing knowledge of imagery;
8.           Physical and Material

Cotton then goes on to look at the origins of art photography, claiming it is in work of Eggleston, Shore, and the Bechers.

Chapter 1 If This is Art

The common theme in this chapter is artists who have had an idea, a concept, and manifested it with a series of photographs.

Examples are:

             Sophie Calle following a man to Venice unbeknown to him and chronicling the events by photographs and notes, and eating food of a different colour each day for a week. Interesting for first part is how stalking someone you don't know would be viewed had a man followed a woman;
             Kulik's animal pictures;
             Orimoto's Bread Man sequence where photographer covers his face with loaves of bread;
             Gillian Wearing asking people she did not know to write a sign about themselves and hold it up in front of camera - again one wonders whether a man could get away with this;
             Deployed writing witticisms on images;
             Davis,s series of images taken at night time of windows reflecting the neon signs of fast food joints.

And there are many more.

I find this sort of imagery difficult. I am not a big fan of contemporary art anyway. Much of it appears arrogant. It almost seems to scream to the audience : "This is not skilful but I dare you to say so." The "skill" is supposed to be in the drafting of the concept, in using the medium to say something subtly. But I find the message too obtuse to tease out in most cases. There is a sense in me that says we have things the wrong way round: it is as if the artist/photographer produces a work that is deliberately ambiguous and defies his or her audience to find the message. To me, the artist should be clear about what he or she is saying; enunciate it and let the viewer decide on whether the artist has succeeded. It is not a guessing game. Now sometimes this happens, but often it does not.

Secondly I am very unconvinced that some of these series say anything useful at all. Simply do not get the point of taking images of windows reflecting the Big Mac sign, for example. It seems as if the artist is almost trying too hard - trying to find a concept using the medium rather then using the medium of photography to demonstrate his or her point.  In order to  make a name for themselves, too many artist/photographers are simply inventing wacky topics with dubious intellectual value.

Chapter 2 Once upon a Time

This chapter is about storytelling in contemporary art photography. Some of the photographs make reference to fables and fairy tales.

Often described as tableau or tableau vivant photography as the pictorial narrative is concentrated in a single image.

One proponent is Jeff Wall. I like Passerby  on page 48,  clearly a staged photograph but the message of fear in the dark night is clear.

Some photographers use earlier works of art as an inspiration, e.g Tom Hunter's Thoughts of Life and Death.

One theme of tableau photography is to depict figures with back to camera so that character is unexplained. Good example is Hannah Starkey March 2002, of a woman sitting in an Oriental canteen.

There is a school too that uses children in mock ups of tales of fears and fantasies. Deborah Messa Polly's image Legs  is an example of using female characters in allegories of tales. Here she uses the legs of Goldilocks with the phallic tail of a pantomime lion. Van Lamsweerde and Matadin's Widow is a disturbing image of a girl in black appearing to be possessed but dressed immaculately.

Like Charlie White's Understanding Joshua, series of images in which Joshua is part alien puppet. Cotton makes point that this is a rare injection of humour into art.

Finally, Cotton turns to tableau photography that finds allegory and drama in physical and architectural space. Like Katherine Bosse's images of spaces designed for sexual play., e.g. Classroom p71.
Like too Cerca Paseo de Marti on p77 by Desiree Dolon. Depicts a Cuban classroom in which the empty chairs face impassioned political statements on the blackboard and a portrait of Fidelity Castro.

Got on much better with this chapter. Could see more readily what the photographers were seeking to achieve, much less the sense that subjects were being sought to fit the photography, more that the photography reflected ideas. Or perhaps just mellowing a little...








Feedback from Assignment 2



Received feedback from Assignment 2.

Sometimes, you do something and you have a feel as to whether a piece of work is good or not. It is often a function of how easy it was to do; how well it flows. I had an instinct that my Assignment would be well received; I thought it was a good idea; I enjoyed doing it; and the narrative flowed. My best work has tended to be when I work my day to day photography with the OCA course. This  Assignment was done while on holiday in Scotland; as said in the Assignment itself, the structure required of the Assignment, and the need to do some background research, fulfilled me as a photographer much more than taking random shots on the day.

Tutor agrees with subject matter: "You made a really great choice of subject...". Further, "The images that you have produced for this assignment are strong."

Pleased to see that tutor agrees that the narrative is strong and notes the flow. This was a result of having the idea in my head of how the story should be told, and using the images to demonstrate this, rather than fitting narrative around the images.

Tutor comments that the images of the girl and the woman eating are not so necessary, albeit acknowledging my justification. I understand the comment, and, to be honest, maybe was sufficiently taken with these images to work the narrative round them, an indication of the interaction between the narrative and the photography.

On technical point, tutor says she would like to see the information on camera settings used. I had asked previously whether settings information should be included in captions and received following response:



"To give you feedback on the technical aspects of your work, it useful to have settings to refer to. I don't see a need to necessarily put these in the blog though and not for the exercises. Now in this respect the AOP is more heavily centred around camera techniques and therefore these perhaps have more relevance than they will as you progress upwards."
I originally took this to mean that settings information is not required, but what is actually being said is that settings information does not need to be on captions. Will include as appended information in future.


Tutor says "On occasion the images on screen could be a tad sharper", adding whether a faster shutter speed and/or a monopod would have helped. Short answer is yes for both, although monopod would not have been usable for some of the shots. A better solution might have been to do have some further post processing. Having spent time on other Scotland images, I have refreshed my knowledge of Topaz products. Topaz Adjust and Topaz Detail both have excellent sharpening possibilities, boosting structure or adding sharpening. These work far better than the unsharp mask tool in Photoshop, and would have overcome the slight problem noted. Compare the before and after on the following two images:

per the blog

sharpened using Topaz Detail

per the blog

sharpened using Topaz Detail 2

The sharpened images are better, bringing out detail in the mountains as well as the subjects. TD2 does not work for all images but will use for most assignment images in future.

Overall conclusion is "well done..interesting collection of images...your analysis and supporting notes are very strong".  Pleased with this feedback.

Also good progress noted with learning log. Need of do some more work on this  over next few weeks.

Overall, have enjoyed this Chapter very much. I thought it would be interesting, as have taken a lot of people unaware shots in the past; I am not fazed by the prospect of photographing people when they do not know. The main learning outcome has been to understand the concept of narrative better (along with the reading that have noted elsewhere in the learning log)  but also some technical points about using wide angle and zoom lenses. I understand better the concept of having something to say via the medium of photography.